One Thing the Buddha has to Teach to Christians
January 13, 2012 Leave a Comment
For the record, I don’t think that all religions are basically the same—and I don’t see how any serious student of religion can think that. That’s not to deny the obvious truth that all religions have things in common and some similarities. But it’s because of those differences that I think the various religions have things to teach each other.
Buddhism has always fascinated me, and I think it has a great deal to teach my tradition—Christianity. One of those teachings comes from the stories of the life of the Buddha. According to Buddhist tradition, Siddhartha Gautama grew up as a prince, surrounded by unimaginable luxury. His parents, intending him to be a powerful ruler, purposely kept from him any ugliness or suffering that would upset his view of the world. One fateful day, however, the young prince ventured out from beyond the palace walls, and encountered for the first time a frail, elderly man, a diseased man, and a decaying corpse, and was suddenly made aware of the sad realities of suffering and death that stalk all humanity. It is this realization that drives Siddhartha to become an ascetic, eventually pursuing the path to enlightenment.
It’s critical that Siddhartha’s encounter with suffering was so life transforming. Siddhartha recognized that something was wrong with the world, and that some great change was needed. As such, there is a strong theme of compassion, as a basic religious practice, that winds its way throughout Buddhist teaching.
Compassion has a place in Christianity, too; over and over the Gospels report Jesus having compassion and reaching out to hurting people. Buddhism and Christianity have an ethic of compassion in common.
In 21st century American Christianity, we have, I want to suggest, by and large lost that ethic of compassion. Our unique contribution to historical Christianity, that of fundamentalist Evangelicalism, has placed all the focus on the cross of Christ, to the virtual exclusion of the life and teachings of Jesus. The rampant individualism that defines American culture added a corrupting layer to Evangelicalism, erecting a theological throne for the idea of “personally accepting Jesus,” which quickly becomes distorted into a personal responsibility to accept Jesus—one that each individual can, perhaps must, pursue in isolation from others. The guiding paradigm of Christianity, then, has become the personal responsibility to accept Jesus in order to go to heaven when one dies, effectively divorcing heaven and earth, this life and the next.
Indeed, too often our connection between Christianity and the world in which we live, aside from trying to convince other people to accept Jesus (or more often, simply condemning those who don’t) has become conflated with civil religion: go to church, be a good citizen, work hard, don’t do anything naughty. The ethic of Christianity has been reduced from compassion to merely being nice.
And that allows us to go through this life largely untroubled by the suffering around us. Oh sure, we’re concerned that people should accept Jesus and go to heaven—and sometimes, there is some legitimate compassion in that desire, in its own theological context. But placing all the emphasis there often causes us to lose concern for the this world and the real people who live in it. We might take umbrage when someone commits some naughtiness, and we sometimes rail about various moral “issues” in games of political football. But we are largely satisfied living comfortably as well-off people in a ridiculously wealthy nation, and Christianity becomes a concern for the next life, not for this one.
We are not troubled by how broken this world really is, mostly because we kind of like it here. We give everyone personal responsibility to accept Jesus and then leave it at that, busy living our own lives and enjoying ourselves. We shake our heads at the man sleeping in a doorway but shrug our shoulders and murmur, “Well, that’s the way it is.” We complain about the high cost of giving free meals to schoolchildren, suggesting that their parents should take more responsibility for their lives. More grossly, a political party supposedly dominated by those calling themselves evangelical Christians is able to cheer at the suggestion that someone might die because they don’t have health insurance.
We may occasionally give a few bucks to a man holding a cardboard sign on a street corner and pat ourselves on the back for doing a good deed, a random act of kindness. But it doesn’t really bother us—it doesn’t cause our hearts to break—that there are people standing on street corners with cardboard signs. We are so satisfied with life and our lucky places in it that we forget that something is really wrong with this world, that this miserable little planet desperately needs help. Nothing causes us to weep with compassion anymore.
And that’s what the Buddha can teach us. He reminds us to open our eyes and see the suffering around us—the same way Jesus lived. The Buddha saw that there was an immense problem, saw that life was broken, and did not rest until he found some answers for it. If we follow Jesus, who lived with compassion, who wept for the pain humanity endures, we cannot live otherwise.
